Tuesday, July 22, 2003

Farewell, Mr Jefferies

I just saw this obit, on the BBC of all places. Matt Jefferies as passed away.

On the wall above my desk at home I have a simple and elegant drawing. It's a piece of set design from Mr. Jefferies' note books. I much admire his work. A man who few knew his name, but virtually everyone on the planet who's been anywhere near a TV in the last 35 years has seen and been influenced by it.

And so, a little story.

I'm a fan of Star Trek, but a bit different than most you've met or imagined. I was the right age for it, born in 1960, but my parents weren't interested. I remember seeing only part of one episode during its original three year run ("The Tholian Web"). From where we lived, on the prairies of Southern Illinois, we didn't get it in syndication, even later. Soon, at age eleven, I was starting to read science fiction and discovered at a local book store a thin volume labeled "Star Trek 9". The ninth in a series of novelizations of the series by James Blish. I was hooked, instantly, and began saving my dimes and buying books as I could find them. Before long I new all of the stories by heart, never having see a complete one. I had a poster, a montage on my bedroom wall. My imagination filled in all the details with the rough out line of the pictures and the well-told stories.

I quickly moved on to read widely in science fiction and well beyond as well. But those early days of stories and imagined flights to the stars made me a fan forever. It aggravates me to read the fanboy sites and arguments about dogma and orthodoxy. I've never been to a convention, I won't argue with you the fine points of plots, characters, and technology. But my youngest daughter and I make sure to see every new episode of Enterprise, together.

In my dreams I sit on the bridge of the starship Enterprise truly go where no one has gone before.

Thank you, Matt Jefferies.

Monday, July 21, 2003

Blogging In the Not So Daily Mode

Been travel'n. All work related. Makes Randy a dull boy.

And of course, now that I'm back, I get to dig out from the email which I couldn't retrieve and respond to, the work that's piled up, and the phone messages (which I mostly ignore, but still . . .).

Can't wait for wireless everywhere. Oh, and don't like hauling around a laptop, either.

For this trip I needed a Windows laptop to demonstrate software, so I got a temporary one - a new Sony VAIO. It was small, light, with integrated wireless. I hated it, even disregarding the typically aggravating Windows nonsense.

Here's the one tell-tale. The power cord "wrap" was a foot long piece of velcro. Thank you very much. Most of the time, it's caught in its own snarl. I compare to the thoughtful Apple engineering. They'd never put up with that (Steve Jobs would put someone's head on a pike for even suggesting it). And this was Sony. I expected more from them. But the machine was in a plain box, no setup instructions, and in less than 1 week's gentle use the CD/DVD door fell off and the whole thing was already beginning to looked scuffed and shabby. I returned it gladly to Circuit City with their "No Questions Asked" policy. Of course, they asked me 2 questions, but I let them off without calling them on the issue. They wanted to know if anything was wrong with it and I was charitable in telling them "no, it worked, but didn't meet my needs".

Friday, July 11, 2003

Not Quite The Thing

Hmm, this old thing again: You are your music collection.

Hmm - I don't buy it.

However, I do form opinions about people by their books. It's more than judging a book owner by their covers. And I clearly know that their is a significant difference between what someone has read and the books they choose to keep. And beyond that, it's only a clue to their personality and intellect, not a precise map. But when I visit someone's house, one of the first things I look for is their reading material. Too often I find nothing. Zip, nada, zero. Maybe a magazine. An old copy of People. Yikes.

What can you tell about me by the books you see in my house? Well, it depends in what room you're in.

If you enter the house from the front door, you'll find the music room on your right. A baby grand piano and string base. No recorded music evident. You'll have to look through the music cabinet there, but you'll only find what we're playing recently. My drawer is filled with Scott Joplin, the Grieg lyric pieces, a few pop collections (James Taylor, Billy Joel, and one of my favorites, some nifty arrangements by Jimmy Web of his hits). Maybe some Broadway scores, like Guys and Dolls, some Irving Berlin and a collection of Oscar Hammerstein. Other drawers contain the girls current lesson. Jennifer's neatly organized in her music case, Kathleen's jumbled in the drawer, probably not closed, and strewn across the piano. The rest of the music is in the living room cabinets.

Oh, back to the books.

You'll enter the family room and find a wall of books. It's overflowing and I'm beginning to wonder where I'll put the next 40 years or so of them. Starting in the far corner you'll find shelves loaded with religion, philosophy, classics and mythology, science, and humor. The next section is largely history - a shelf or so of American and another or so of world. Lower down you'll find mystery with a large section filled with James Lee Burke and another with a significant collection of early 20th century American mystery. The lower shelf in the section is filled with Ghost stories and horror. Another full section is filled with plays and books on theater, with a few on movies. These shelves are all for the most part hardback with a few trade paperbacks (the plays are mostly actual play books and scripts).

By my leather reading chair is a book stand with a few in current reading.

But if you go upstairs to my office/den, you'll find a very different me. Another leather chair, but this one less formal than the overstuffed monster down stairs. This one is a Ekornes "Stressless" with footstool. You'll find another entire wall, also bursting with books. Here you'll find paperbacks as well as hard backs. Lots of science fiction, categorized loosely. One shelf is dedicated to naval fiction, mostly Patrick O'Brian. A middle section is reference and science texts, computer software.

I think that a knowledgeable reader spending a few minutes browsing my shelves might be able to judge the following: The collector is likely male, a voracious and wide reader. Given to self entertainment, probably highly imaginative. Fairly well educated, but mostly self-educated in literature. Curious, restless, politically hard to pin down, but with the lack of any identifiable political books, it's likely that the reader is not a conservative. In fact, taken in whole, it's likely that the reader does not identify with a party or political bent. The stack of Barbara Tuckman books suggests, combined with the books on science and skepticism bear this out.

The additional information of the titles and condition of the books would add to this profile, but I'll leave that to you if you visit me.

What do the books you keep say about you?

Oh, from their list in the article, I have only the Beethovan. I have a wide classical collection, lots of Jazz, a little pop, but very little recent. My iPod is loaded with a pretty interesting mix, but not if you only listen to top 40 radio.

Tuesday, July 08, 2003

Chilling Headline - Well, At Least For Me

Just saw this headline on cnn.com Last Ship Of Mars Armada Starts Trip.

What, there's an armada? Why wasn't I notified? How could you have left without me? Is something terrible about to happen here?

As if I didn't have enough nightmares about atomic bombs and tornados, now I'll dream about being left behind (please keep your damn rapture warnings to yourself).

Wednesday, July 02, 2003

The Onion Strikes Again

Ah, satire.

Bush Asks Congress For $30 Billion To Help Fight War On Criticism

At least I wish it was satire. I think it's too on the mark, so we'll just call it reportage.

Tuesday, July 01, 2003

Back at it

Digging out from the backlog almost makes one consider never vacationing at all.

Nah.

As to the beach books. The James Lee Burke, while his typical excellent writing, is the same novel, yet again, but set in the Civil War. Fine for a beach read.

Oh, but the book by Mr. Branton, a disappointment. I hereby give up on critically acclaimed modern comic novelists. I toss this in the same heap as the equally bad "The Corrections" and "The Teatherballs of Bougainvillea". Note, I don't link these works. I'm not going to make it easy for anyone to read these. Do so at your own risk.

I've started, but not finished George Dyson's book. What fun! First and second hand history by someone that understands what's going on. Just imagine what life would be like today if we'd let the physicist build and run the space program instead of the bureaucrats and test pilots.

And Jennifer and I are reading the latest Harry Potter out loud. We're only getting through a chapter or so a day. We're enjoying it, so if you've read it already, keep your mouth shut!

Wednesday, June 18, 2003

Away

I'll be "off post" for a bit - heading off for our yearly beach vacation. I've got the stack of books ready. They include:

House of Wacks (although mine didn't come with the nifty Betty Page cover.
White Doves At Morning James Lee Burke (my beach buddy for over a dozen years)
Project Orion George Dyson - totally blown away by his Darwin Among the Machines

Of course, I couldn't resist, so the new Harry Potter will be waiting for us at the Lighthouse View when we get there on Saturday. I hope to get some family reading time in before the press spoils the whole thing.

Tuesday, June 17, 2003

La Vida TV

BoingBoing has been covering a recent spate of cellphone legislation around the world. Most of it's directed at the camera enabled. I do not currently own one of these, but I'm sure it's only a matter of time. Personally, why would I want a crappy digital camera? Well, because you'd always have it with you. A crappy photo of something happening is far better than no photo at all. Eventually this technology will be woven into our clothes - virtually impossible to limit cameras, voice and video from anywhere. Can't ban it, so better start figuring out how to live with it.

And the phone cameras won't be crappy forever. I'm increasingly aware that the cellphone is becoming the platform of the future. In fact, I can easily imagine a future where the personal computer disappears and we simply lease space and processing from (I'm not sure who - hopefully not the phone companies). At home or at work we'd have a monitor of some sorts, but our cellphones would give us exactly the same amount of access. I love my iPod, I use my Palm but love it less daily, but I NEVER leave the house without my phone. What I really want is one indestructible and cheap device (virtually disposable), that give me access to unlimited computing power, every piece of music, film or TV show, every book ever written, that fits in my pocket or on my belt.

Do I want it to fit in my ear? Probably not. but I'd love for it to talk to my sunglasses. Worried about invasion of privacy? You should be. But banning the technology is a poor way of attacking the problem. So, how do you fight it? Etiquette!

I'm serious - more to come.

Friday, June 13, 2003

Field of Vision

Last night I went to see The Matrix Reloaded, shown on the local IMAX. My friend, Penny joined me.

Wow.

This is an amazing way to see a feature film, but perhaps too intense for regular viewing. The picture, huge, bright, crystal clear, was actually too big. One couldn't see it all. And the shear size of the image and its quality did no favors for the actors skin - showing every flaw in striking detail.

Now perhaps that's one of the visual effects the directors were after, and I have no complaints on that side. I found the movie, the 2nd of 3 parts, to be visually stunning, entertaining, and engrossing. I await the next and final chapter (as opposed to the next Star Wars movie, which I rather dread).

But back to the IMAX. I'm becoming something of a cinema connoisseur, not movies, mind you, where I'm certainly an enthusiastic amateur, but for the movie house itself. Having studied and built my own cinema, I've had to examine and consider the environment for viewing movies for over a year now. I'm by no means an expert, but I an keenly aware of the items that make for an ideal, and less than ideal movie experience. I can't explain acoustics, but I've worked with those who do, as well as lighting, projection, image quality, even seating and refreshments. By way of proof, a friend and frequent movie goer (at least once a week if not more) when visiting my cinema recently reported that watching a movie (actually The Matrix), was "the best movie or theater experience I've had in over 20 years", only to be matched by a now closed 20s era movie palace.

But back to my point. The IMAX may produce physically undesirable effects - it's just too big, too loud, too intense and too immersive. I was tired and had a bit of a headache coming out of the movie.

In addition, I'd written recently about enjoying watching the credits. On this screen, once again, they're too big and difficult to focus on. They may have been easier to see, read, and understand on a smaller or normal sized movie screen. It will be interesting to see this film in my cinema when it becomes available on DVD.

All that aside - a very interesting way to see a movie and I'm open to seeing another on the IMAX screen to try it again.

Discuss

Wednesday, June 11, 2003

Out of Sorts

Ah, I am such a creature of habit. After doing the radio interview last night it was 11 - the time I typically go to bed. Normally, I've had an hour or so to unwind, watch TV, be ready to drop of, which I usually do within minutes of closing my eyes.

But to be spun up into full marketing mode, the adrenaline flowing, heart pumping, isn't an on/off situation. So a had a snack (not really needed, now was it?) and read until after 12. This morning I can't get my head clear.

And to add to matters, I'm wearing this damn bandage on my head. Sunday night I bent over to look at something on the tread mill and when I straightened up I caught the edge of the control panel and ripped a piece of scalp clean off. Lost about 3 or 4 square inches of skin. For someone with a full head of hair it would have been a glancing blow.

If it had been on a leg or arm it would have been an unpleasant abrasion. But on one's naked scalp, a surprisingly sensitive area, it's an open, oozing wound. It it were a bit lower on my forehead I'd look like Gorbachev.

Tuesday, June 10, 2003

CptnRandy On The Air

Tonight, I'll be doing my day job (yes, you heard me) and be on the "Computer America" radio show with Craig Crossman.

If you would like listen, here's their web site for streaming audio or you can go through their web site. 10:30 Eastern time. I believe there will be an archive with streaming audio as well.

Monday, June 09, 2003

Search the Blog

This is pretty cool - Technorati Keword Search.

What is it? It's a search engine for blogs and it's stunningly up-to-date!

Friday, June 06, 2003

Simon Dumenco is a Fraud

Hrumph. Doc Searls lead me to this link - an article titled "American Idle". In it the writer, Simon Dumenco slashes away at technology, specifically TiVo and blogs. He claims that these technologies are making him lazy, impassive, and yes, a fraud in claiming he's seen or read something he has not.

Ah, but the fault, dear Simon, is not in our blogs, but in ourselves. Or more specifically, in yourself.

I find TiVo useful, VERY useful. But I wouldn't bother to claim to have watched something that I have no interest in and I certainly wouldn't record it so I could claim with a clear conscience that I'd watch it sometime in the future. That's your problem, Simon, not mine.

And I use other peoples' blogs to help me find interesting and useful stuff and see their opinion of what they've found. Only a fraud wouldn't read the source. I read your article, Simon, but I never would have found it without Doc blogging it. I know who Doc Searls is. Who the hell are you?

Such stuff you say.

Thursday, June 05, 2003

Link-o-rama

Oh, here's an nifty feature - iTunes integration! So, for example, if I happen to be listening to the Riders In The Sky singing Wah-Hoo from the album "A Great Big Western Howdy..." by Riders In The Sky I can link it all up with ease!

And here's my little link test, as well: .
Riders Online

Yet Another Blog Tool

Trying another blog posting tool - this one's called "Kung-Log". Looks pretty good - still not as easy as emailing. Then again, the *&$#!!! email submission through BloggerPro is unreliable, at best. And I still can't get my XML straightened out.

Of Cats and Dictionaries

My friend Penny has put together a list of Cat-lover's dictionary of terms and behaviors.

I've contributed one - anyone else have something to add? Use your well honed email skills and receive the credit you so richly deserve! (No, don't send them to me. What am I going to do with cat terms? On the other hand, if you do send them to me, I'll take credit for the good ones.)

Don't Know Why

Kathleen introduced me to Norah Jones last year. I'd probably heard her by then, but not really brought her into foreground processing. She is, admittedly, much more interesting to listen to than virtually all of the other pop played on the radio (I do like Five for Fighting).

I saw her mentioned in the news today and it reminded me of a question. What is the meaning of her song, "Don't Know Why"? I went to the web, but after reading what I could find, it was obvious that they don't get it. It's not about something - it's a story, or more to the point, a lament.

The content: an alcoholic, presently inebriated and unable to rise to full emotion, wistfully reminisces about a love that could have been, but will never be.

It's a torch song, folks, but ultimately depressing!

Wednesday, June 04, 2003

Another bad idea

Another bad idea.

I'm a bald man and content with my lot. If they had a cheap and effective baldness treatment ("here, swallow this pill and make an appointment with the hair stylist"), I'd take it, but I'm fine with things the way they are. In fact, I shave the wispy strands on the top of my head. I often consider stopping men with comb-overs and other poor hair-o-flage and telling them that the jig is up.

Anyhoo - just like bringing back the Mamoths, can chick with teeth be a good thing? Buckeye egg, just North of here has 14 MILLION chickens. Besides the poor management and environmental mess they cause, imagine what they'd be like if they could bite back!

SETI @ Home

I can see that the PC behind me has just picked up the 1219th work unit
in my little search for intelligent life in the universe. It's one of
4 machines I've got using their spare processing power to work on this
little task. I had one other online, but it's off on someone else's
desk now, no longer part of the search.

I started several years ago, then dropped off after nearly 1000 units,
using just one machine. When they popped back up in the news lately I
decided to load it up again, with some real horsepower. My desktop at
work is a Dual 1 ghz G4 PowerMac. It rips through work units at nearly
2 a day. The old PC behind me takes 4 days to get through 1. It's too
bad the software can't use both processors - I'd love to see how fast
that'd go.

Why do this? I'm not sure we'll ever find anything this way, but it's
worth the spare processing. Plus, it's a neat screen saver. Other
than that, it's a fascinating start at using the computers connected to
the net as more than just advanced TVs. There's power out there, and
possibility.

What possibilities? Ah, talk to Mr. Dyson (not that one, his son, Esther's brother).

Links:
SETI @ Home
SETI
Darwin Among The Machines - By George Dyson

Monday, June 02, 2003

Unexpected Home Theater Benefit

While I must admit I've been just this side of giddy since we finished Cinema Murray, my wife and I have discovered a unique benefit to watching movies there (get your mind out of the gutter!): Credits!

Movie credits are designed for a big screen and next to impossible to read on a TV screen, even a big RPTV. On the 110" they're perfectly readable.

When we go out to movies we like to stay and watch credits - we're interested in who contributed, locations, music, etc., but at home and watching on TV there isn't much point. And forget about trying to watch credits for a broadcast TV movie (actually, I don't watch broadcast TV movies anymore and when I do watch TV, it's through TiVO - no commercials!)

Take for example, last night. It was a double feature: Romancing The Stone with the girls, then Night Shift when they went to bed (Barney Rubble, what and actor!).

Watching the credits, we discovered that Kevin Costner and Shannon Doherty are both in the movie (Night Shift Credits)! We popped back through the scenes to confirm that yes, both were on screen for a few seconds. You'll also find Vincent Schiavelli in his traditional weird, scarry guy roll, but you can never miss this guy He's also in the opening moments of Amadeus.

In addition, the watching the credits provides a nice "falling away" period from the movie. A transition from being absorbed in the story, a moment or two to think about what you've seen, but not entirely withdrawn, held still by the music, dimmed lights, comfortable chair.